{ENGLISH} CHAPTER 4S1 POINTS TO CONSIDER FOR PLANNING AND DESIGN OF OSD FACTORY – END

CHAPTER 4S1 POINTS TO CONSIDER FOR PLANNING AND DESIGN OF OSD FACTORY – END

13. Comparison between “U” & “I” Layout

The choice between U shape layout and I shape layout depends on the specific needs of the production facility and the process to be carried out. U shape layout is better suited for environments that require high communication and collaboration with flexible workflows, while I shape layout is better for simpler production processes with structured and clear steps. Consideration of factors such as space size, product type, and production volume will also influence the most appropriate layout decision.

14. Relation of SMP (Site Master Plan) and Factory Layout for “I” Shape

The relationship between the Site Master Plan (SMP) and factory layout—specifically with an I Shape layout—plays a crucial role in the overall effectiveness of manufacturing operations.

15. Relation of SMP (Site Master Plan) and Factory Layout for “U” Shape

The relationship between the Site Master Plan (SMP) and factory layout, particularly when adopting a U Shape layout, is significant in establishing an efficient and productive manufacturing environment.

16. Improved Idea from “U” Shape (Central Spine)

The Central Spine concept can be an innovative refinement of the traditional U Shape layout in master site planning and factory layout design. The Central Spine layout combines the benefits of U Shape while improving operational, communication, and workflow efficiency.

17. Actual Sample of Central Spine

This conceptual design showcases how the Central Spine can enhance efficiency, collaboration, and operational flow.

18. Conclusion…